Ross proposal adopted during budget debate

Boston- Citing the need for greater transparency, Representative Richard Ross today praised his colleagues in the House for adopting his amendment that would create a website in which health care providers would list their pricing for services offered.

The Wrentham Republican said the information would be accessible on the Division of Health Care Finance and Policy’s official website and would help consumers make more educated decisions regarding their health care choices.

“Health care costs continue to rise and it is our responsibility as a legislative body to do everything we can to make health care more affordable and accessible,” said Representative Ross. “I believe by providing this information online, we are taking a positive step towards reducing health care costs.”

While arguing in favor of this amendment during the FY11 budget debate, Representative Ross said listing prices will hold providers more accountable because their performance can be compared and contrasted with other providers.

More than thirty other states have statutes requiring hospitals to report pricing information including California, Florida and Nevada.

Representative Ross’ proposal was unanimously adopted on a voice vote.

Perry Amendment Gaining Momentum

There’s a growing debate in the United States about immigration reform and while Arizona’s new law has been getting much media attention, today an amendment offered by Representative Jeff Perry is gaining momentum right here in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

The Sandwich Republican offered the amendment to the FY11 budget which would add a new section requiring the verification of lawful presence before awarding public benefits. To put it simply, if signed into law, it would prevent illegal immigrants from accessing public assistance.

Not surprisingly, after Perry’s amendment was introduced on the House floor, Democratic leaders quickly offered a further amendment, sending it to study. Here’s the kicker…last year on May 1, 2009, the same exact amendment was offered and again, Democrats sent it to study. There was a major difference however between last year’s vote and this year’s. In fact, when the House voted on the further amendment last year, 118 representatives voted to send it to further study, essentially killing debate on the issue. This year, that number dwindled with only 82 members voting to send it to further study.

What a turnaround from last year! Regardless of what the economic ramifications would be of adopting this amendment, the fact of the matter is this is good public policy. Given the current economic crisis, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is having a hard enough time providing assistance to citizens here legally. It is mind-boggling and furthermore a slap in the face to taxpayers that we continue to provide taxpayer-subsidized assistance to people here illegally.

While we believe it’s about time this common sense proposal becomes reality, it is past time we had a straight up or down vote on this amendment.

In Case You Missed It: Boston Herald Calls out Dems’ for Avoiding Tough Votes

As we reported here on The Capitol View last night, Republican lawmakers offered two amendments yesterday aimed at reducing the tax burden on the people and small businesses of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Our effort to roll back the sales tax and repeal the sales tax on alcohol purchases was quickly rejected by Democratic leadership who decided to pull a well known political maneuver, further amending our amendments by sending them to study.

Well, the Boston Herald was paying attention and called out the Democrats who voted to kill debate and avoid a difficult vote in an election year.

Click here to read the Boston Herald editorial.

Debate? We don’t need no stinking debate!

The Massachusetts House of Representatives today debated a number of amendments to the FY11 budget. Among the many amendments were two Republican-offered proposals – one of which would have rolled back the sales tax to 5% and the other was aimed at repealing the sales tax on alcohol purchases.

Not surprisingly, the Democratic Leadership shut down debate on both of the amendments with an old tactical maneuver – they sent the amendments to further study! While we here at The Capitol View remain frustrated with Democratic House leaders, we were pleased that several Democrats joined us in voting against the silly further amendments. For those of you who don’t know…further amending an amendment by sending it to study is a way to avoid taking what may be seen as a tough vote.

Debate? We don’t need no stinking debate!

It’s important to note that neither one of our proposals would have taken effect until July 1, 2011. However, if both respective ballot questions are successful, the changes would take effect on January 1, 2011, severely impacting this year’s budget.

Jones: Republicans score bipartisan victory

BOSTON— Calling it a bipartisan victory, House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. today praised his colleagues in the Massachusetts House of Representatives for adopting his amendment to protect taxpayers from yet another tax increase.

As you may recall, the House Ways and Means Committee proposed allowing municipalities to raise property taxes outside of the constraints of the so-called “proposition 2½ limits” without a local vote.

Representative Jones, with the support of all of his Republican colleagues, filed an amendment to the so-called Municipal Relief Bill striking out the language permitting the increase of property taxes absent an override vote.

“Since the Patrick-Murray Administration assumed office in 2007, the average property tax bill has increased by 18%; from $3,962 in FY07 to the current $4,671,” said Representative Jones. “Taxpayers can’t afford to foot the bill for the continued fiscal mismanagement by the Patrick-Murray Administration. Today, the Massachusetts House of Representatives took a significant step to protect the wallets of taxpayers and Proposition 2 ½, which passed 30 years ago.”

Citizens for Limited Taxation had estimated that if this bill passed with the original language, it would cost Massachusetts taxpayers more than $500 million in increased property taxes.

“I applaud my colleagues across the aisle for joining me in this cause,” added the top Republican in the House.

Who says the Minority Party can’t be effective?

A Republican amendment to strike out controversial language that would allow cities and towns to essentially circumvent Prop 2 1/2 in the so-called Municipal Relief Bill is picking up the support of editorial boards across the Commonwealth, particularly the Boston Herald.

“Whatever the actual amount, the provision is clearly an end-run around Prop 2 ½ - and that ought to make it a non-starter in a year when taxpayers have already had it up to their eyeballs with tax hikes,” said the Herald Editorial Staff in today’s paper.

The editorial goes on to read, “Republican lawmakers will propose an amendment removing the provision when it hits the House floor this week. The result ought to be clear. This assault on property taxpayers must be halted.”

Meanwhile, just a few minutes ago, State House News Service reported that Seth Gitell, spokesman for Speaker DeLeo said, "That provision will be struck down with the start of House action today. The Speaker has always said he doesn't expect any new taxes in this budget and he doesn't support whatsoever any weakening of Proposition 2 1/2."

Who said the Minority Party can’t be effective?

The House will be taking up this bill today and The Capitol View will be checking in later to let its readers know the status of the bill.

GOP Leaders: Taxpayers can’t afford to pay anymore

Boston- Citing the poor economy and the already high tax burden, House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. and Senate Minority Leader Richard R. Tisei today vowed to fight against any legislative proposal that would allow cities and towns to raise property taxes on the people of Massachusetts.

This comes after learning that the House Ways and Means Committee proposed allowing municipalities to raise property taxes outside of the constraints of the so-called “proposition 2½ limits” without a local vote.

Given the negative economic climate in Massachusetts, the top Republicans in the House and Senate were outraged to hear that a legislator could be so disconnected to think taxpayers could afford to pay another dollar in property taxes.

“It’s simply mind-boggling that in a time when foreclosure initiations spiked more than 20% from last month, a Democratic lawmaker on Beacon Hill could have the audacity to suggest raising taxes, yet again,” said Representative Jones. “If this isn’t a slap in the face to the taxpayers, I don’t know what is,” the House Republican Leader added.

On Monday, the Massachusetts House of Representatives will take up a Municipal Relief Bill, which contains the proposal. Representative Jones has already filed an amendment that would strike out the language permitting the increase of property taxes absent an override vote.

Citizens for Limited Taxation estimates that property owners could see as much as $550 million in additional property taxes if the proposal is adopted during Monday’s debate.

“This is just another glaring example of one-party rule run amok on Beacon Hill,” said Senator Tisei. “The Governor and the Democratic leadership have raised taxes by more than a billion dollars over the last two fiscal years, driving the Commonwealth’s economy further into the ground. Adding to that burden will only further hurt the state’s competitiveness and tug at the purse strings of hardworking families across the state.”

Republican lawmakers in both the House and Senate have offered hundreds of millions of dollars in cost saving initiatives over the last three budget cycles and they plan to do the same this year as well.

Jones Files Amendment to Restore Local Aid

BOSTON—Saying the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has an obligation to cities and towns across the state, House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. has filed an amendment to the FY11 House Ways and Means budget that would restore local aid.

The amendment, which is expected to garner bipartisan support during next week’s budget debate, would restore Chapter 70 and Unrestricted Local Aid to the amount proposed by the Governor in his FY11 budget. Representative Jones proposes raising the Chapter 70 appropriation to $4.05 billion and the Unrestricted Local Aid appropriation to $936 million. The current appropriations are $3.85 billion and $899million respectively.

“The residents of Massachusetts benefit greatly when cities and towns across the Commonwealth are fully funded,” said the North Reading Republican. “Since the downturn of the economy, communities haves suffered the most, seeing their local aid slashed time and time again. I say enough is enough – no longer should cities and towns bear the burden for poor fiscal management by Democratic leadership on Beacon Hill.”

The amendment being offered by the Minority Leader is similar to the local aid resolution Republican lawmakers filed back in March. Several Democrats signed onto that resolution and Representative Jones is hopeful even more will join his cause this time around.

“As a former selectman from North Reading, I have always made protecting local aid a top priority of mine. Despite the outcome of this fiscal year’s budget debate, I will remain on the front lines in the effort to defend cities and towns from having their state payments slashed.”

Jones blasts Tim Murray for comments about Baker’s kids

BOSTON—House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. issued the following statement after reading Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray’s ill-advised statements in today’s Boston Herald.

Today, I am calling on Governor Deval Patrick to show true leadership and condemn Lieutenant Governor Tim Murray’s nasty barrage on Charlie Baker’s three young children.

I am growing tired of Murray’s ill-advised, negative campaign tactics. What’s particularly disheartening is it appears Murray spends more time launching attacks on his opponents than he does acting as second in command of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

It’s laughable that Tim Murray is going after Charlie Baker while Deval Patrick returns comfortably every night to one of his multi-million dollar mansions all while raising taxes on the middle class and spending Massachusetts into the ground.

Instead of attacking Charlie Baker for his fear of his children’s future in the Bay State, the Patrick-Murray Administration should focus on the campaign promises they made nearly four years ago; cutting property taxes, creating 100,000 new jobs and adding 1,000 new police to our streets.

Jones’ Reaction to Tim Cahill’s latest publicity stunt

BOSTON—House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. issued the following statement after hearing Tim Cahill, most recently a member of the Democratic Party, planned to crash this weekend’s State Republican Convention.

It appears Tim Cahill’s campaign is throwing yet another political “Hail Mary” as he continues his effort to persuade voters that he is a conservative-minded, independent thinker.

Tim Cahill is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, traveling around the state saying whatever is politically convenient at the time. Cahill, who was for Deval Patrick before he was against him, supports increasing taxes, is against tax cuts and would continue the failed policies we’ve seen from the Patrick-Murray Administration. A vote for Tim Cahill is a vote for the status quo.